Gallagher has played numerous times up front including at the weekend v Luton and looked exactly the same. Not up to standard. Your logic of dropping Armstrong following a good game makes absolutely no sense either. Also, he would argue that he prefers to play up front but thats a seperate argument. And @chaddyrovers until we start actually creating good chances, something we have failed to consistently this season, and scoring more goals then ultimately it is impossible to suggest that our current tactic is working as it should attacking.

Makes no sense to drop him though when he does have that good game. Especially when Gallagher is in your team despite repeated insipid performances including again last night.

Very harsh to drop Downing.

I know that you cant name the exact same team 46 times but you should know your best team. We are totally lacking in consistency and our season seems likely to descend into mediocrity unless we can get it. Rich Sharpe correctly mentioned the back end of last season and the success of the front 4 of Graham, Dack, Rothwell left, Armstrong right. Times its been used this season? Never. Baffling. You keep mentioning our style of play and its effectiveness but we have scored barely any goals. We create very few clear cut chances, we very rarely make the goalkeeper do any serious work, and we dont score enough goals so how on earth can it be considered effective? Hes maybe flirting with the idea of playing more attacking football but he then leaves Holtby and Rothwell on the bench and has Gallagher plodding away down the wing. Senseless.

We are having the ball more but to absolutely no effect whatsoever. We continiously create minimal amounts of clear cut chances, so I dont understand how people can be excited and impressed. The football is boring, slow, monotonous, rarely getting people off their seats. Mowbray is still miles away from stumbling across his best team, and any sort of consistency

Walton Bennett Lenihan Williams Cunningham Travis Downing Holtby Dack Rothwell Armstrong Subs: Leutwiler, Adarabioyo, Nyambe, Evans, Johnson, Chapman, Graham Not quite sure thats where I would play Holtby or Armstrong ideally, but for me thats our best bet.

We didn't create anything, and the passing was far from slick, it was safe, it was lacking urgency, it often ended in a direct and inaccurate ball, it was not progressive or penetrative, the first half in particular was horrible to watch IMO and it was a typical Mowbray first half performance at Ewood. Stodgy, lethargic and regressive. We dont have an identity and Mowbray hasnt got a clue what his strongest team is, neither is good for consistency.

Not at all. If you want to get into the mindset of a top 6 team, any dropped points at home are unwelcome. Forest were there for the taking, they came set up defensively, Carvalho dropped for a slightly more conservative selection, and they were running the clock down at the end. Especially after losing against Luton, and after taking the lead, yesterdays result was very frustrating. What good chances did we create though? I dont think we did enough to win the game..

Woodgate has had a shoddy start too. Id be surprised if he lasts the season.

Good performance? Was you not bored shitless in that first half? Did we really create many clear cut chances? Would you agree that the starting 11 was wrong? You mention that youd play Travis, Downing, Armstrong, Dack and Rothwell and a striker. Which striker baring in mind Gallaghers continued ghastly displays? Holtby has to play for me. With Graham seemingly on the decline and Gallagher and Samuel well below the standard needed, id go Holtby, Dack and Rothwell behind Armstrong on Saturday.

Stoke surely have to sack Jones now. Woeful.

The opposite of Brereton approach!

Another turgid, boring, stodgy Rovers performance under a manager who hasnt the foggiest what his best team is, and whose inconsistent side creates precious few clear cut chances on its descend into what I suspect will be a season of mediocrity and frustration. Sam Gallagher is absolute shite, and another example of big money poured down the drain. Choosing him wide over various alternatives suggested that Mowbray was desperate to get his big money signing into the team, again, totally unwarranted. With Graham having minimal impact too, albeit he is not given the same run of games as Gallagher, it seems inevitable that we will be up shit creek once Graham dips below the standard needed with Gallagher, Brereton and now the returning Samuel all woefully short. The team didnt know what it wanted to do IMO, especially first half. All this bollocks about playing entertaining, passing football has fallen by the wayside, we dont have an identity, we just look confused and lethargic. We have undoubtedly got talented players amidst our ranks but inconsistent selection and tactical confusion seems to be hindering them. Rothwell and Holtby made a big impact when they came on and they have to start games. Mowbray was saying how much he rates Rothwell and how he would have started the last 2 games, if thats the case why is he sub behind Gallagher tonight? Him left, Armstrong right gave us much more balance. Armstrong was better tonight, still can do more but looked much more lively and took his goal well after initially seeming to be a little indecisive. Holtby is a bundle of energy and so much better than most on the ball. Walton had nothing to do but lacks urgency and got nowhere near a cross early on, getting very lucky. The 2 centre backs were fine although were often guilty of some terrible distribution, as was Bennett. Cunningham was the pick of the back line, a very accomplished left back. Travis I thought was pretty poor, often negative and wasteful on the ball, Downing was very economical and a marked improvement on Johnson in there.

If Downing is on the right wing, Armstrong on the left, Gallagher considered for a start and Rothwell and Holtby left out again then no minor tactical alterations will solve the problem IMO.

I think its a little unfair to suggest that he played Rothwell through "gritted teeth." At the end of the day, he did get a decent run of starts. You could argue that the situation was similar to the Travis situation, who I again dont think its fair or accurate to suggest only broke through due to Smallwood red card. Both are situations whereby a younger, exciting player broke into the team, had an instant impact but with contrasting consequences. It was a pretty easy decision on both accounts to leave them in the team, they both improved it. Travis has since been a regular week in week out, and has been a marked improvement on Mowbrays previous favoured fulcrum of Smallwood and Evans. Rothwell wasnt afforded the same chance however, as you suggest totally unjustly dropped back to regular sub, totally unmerited, which is why I dont swallow Mowbrays hollow words on the player in the media. I judge him on actions, he has dealt with Travis well, Rothwell has been hung out to dry with Armstrong repeatedly given chances as one of Mowbrays favourites. The balance of our team looks really poor I must say. I am not sure how you best mould together quite a few very talented players, we have 15m worth of strikers and absolutely no goal threat, and Mowbray is obsessed with constant rotation at the cost of any momentum and cosnsistency.

What he says and does are often 2 different things. He was outstanding at the end of last season and deserved to start the season in the team. He started it on the bench and has only made one start all season in the League, in our hardest game. Compare that to the treatment of Armstrong and its a struggle to justify it on merit.

He suggested that he may become unhappy in the future if he continues to be somewhat unfavoured. Not that he is now unhappy. Its definitely a prediction that has logic to it. Rothwell was absolutely outstanding at the end of last season, and it was agreed that he deserved to start this season in the team and that he could be a huge player for us. Totally unmerited, he has started one solitary game out of 9, whereas Armstrong gets free reign amidst regularly pitiful performances. Tomorrows team will be interesting, Rothwell I think will start, him, Holtby, Dack and Travis have to all be in our best team. I think its which of the others you include to provide the best balance.

Neat and tidy, did nothing of note. I stand by my initial comment.

I am yet to see that Buckley is good enough for the first team.

Not sure they are that useful when theres no mention of goals conceded.

Chapman has been getting goals and assists at that level and was nominated for a personal award. He deserves a chance over Armstrong who has been consistently poor and often lazy ever since we bought him outright.

There was one for both that and goal music. People voted against goal music, it was removed, and now its reared its ugly head again sadly.

Youd think the clubs response would be to listen to fans criticisms such as this, rather than to somewhat flippantly and sarcastically respond like that. Its a strange one as it was only a year since that the club allowed fans to vote on goal music and they voted to get rid.

Dont think it will go anywhere soon sadly.

Yes I was, it was a rhetorical question. Mowbray said post match that it was the best 15 minute performance weve put in all season, which is a huge worry as we didnt come close to scoring. If theres one thing you cannot use in your reasoning as to why a manager wouldnt be any better than Mowbray, being "boring" is certainly not one! The football is turgid to watch.