“I’ve left him out for a few games, because he’s been poor with his distribution and was getting caught on the ball.” Meanwhile, Elliott Bennett has regular terrible performances, gives away penalties at will, but will never be dropped.

I don't know where this Rothwell being more effective as an impact sub has come from, but I don't think it's true at all!

No argument from me with this, but is there something that makes you think he will do this? Knowing that the team each week usually features at least one change....

How's the gaffer expecting me to read that without my glasses?

I’ll be honest, if anyone didn’t take the chance to triple their wages, I’d wonder if everything was alright at home.

I’m so hyped that we won. Bit annoyed at myself for leaving when we were 1-0 down, but you win some, you lose some. Thank Christ we won!!

I really wish we’d stop being shit. I really wish Holtby hadn’t been subbed. I really wish we’d looked like scoring at all today. Fuck off Mowbray.

£45, now £48 for a walk up absolutely beggars belief. In one of the poorest areas in the country to boot. A new low for our club as far as I’m concerned. The lack of empathy from those defending the price is alarming as well.

£45 to watch Rovers isn’t right, whatever way it’s dressed up, even with notice, it’s just wrong. There is literally no defence for that.

Interesting that in one of the Mowbray articles in today's LT he talks about how much he used to head the ball. Lately he's going on like someone that has suffered some blows to the head....

If you knew there was that much possibility of exposing male side boob, you'd button up your shirt, wouldn't you? State of it.....

It's money towards things that they otherwise wouldn't have though. This is coming from someone who has never used theirs!

He’s going to wear the number 32. Their sponsor is 32 Red (a betting firm).

But you gave enough of a shit to comment ?

I think it is, judging by the comments from others, but fair play, you're sticking to your guns! Which they should have, if they're sacking any of them. If Keogh was ten years younger, they wouldn't have sacked him, I think that's a fair assumption. They've thrown him under the bus, because he got injured whilst two other people that caused the injury get a fine and that's it. As a club captain and a long serving player, he's a right to feel aggrieved. I'm very confident he will take this case to court and be successful.

If you sack one, you need to sack them all. It's a proper shady move sacking Keogh off as the passenger (yes, he's complicit as he was happy jumping in the car with someone he knew was hammered) and keeping the other two on, who are the real villains of the piece. Just because they're ten years younger and have re-sale value. It's almost condoning drink-driving in some ways.

You could always just use bold and italic for emphasis instead, like I suggested......

That article is just click bait, at best. Smith loves to be an agent provocateur, but he's very poor at it, so he just comes over as being a proper goon.

Please can we keep posts in one coloured font everyone? Those posts really hurt my eyes. Use the bold or italic selections if you want to use emphasis. Thanks.

What a load of nonsense that is.

Unless you're sacking all three, sacking Keogh alone is harsh and cold.

Aye, in fact, it's the first time I've seen a post have two pages of 'likes'. Given how divided views on this site have been in recent months, that's nothing short of remarkable.

It's obviously fine to think that a post like that is waffle, if that's your opinion. But please can we make sure we're putting more meat on the bones than this please?

Well, there’s no accounting for taste....

Really not sure why anyone is still asking Alan Nixon anything. He’s out of the loop and also very embittered about us.