We're best pals.

Why? You even see Premier League clubs travel by train at times. I've been on a TGV with the PSG players and they literally have more money than they know what to do with.

Plenty of clubs survive. I agree that Ipswich probably had one eye on preparing for the yoyo, but I don't think they spent particularly well. They'll be one of the promotion favs next year, but they did put together a very expensive Championship quality squad.

Definitely one of the worst performances of the season.

A better version to fill Buckley's role. As an alternative to Cantwell. Out on the wing (he's better than the options we currently have). There are quite a few possibilities.

An absolute no-brainer for a player who will at least hold his value. We will absolutely not do it.

We definitely can't complain about the officiating for a while. Felt like a stonewall pen for them (possibly two) right before we went 2-0 up. Plus a host of other decisions that went our way (a soft booking aside).

Great cross. Great header. Gueye isn't convincing, even when doing things right, but that was at least a glimpse of what can happen when he's used properly.

Hedges managed to make an incredible mess out of a 2 v 1 overlap.

And there Weimann has ben incredibly lazy to not gamble on the possibility of the pullback making it to him.

Pretty awful from Weimann. We should clip that highlight and send it to India. It may even convince the blind that we are in need of a better goalscorer.

And, at that point, I realised that I could stop listening.

Not only do we need improvement up front, but we also need options. I'll welcome virtually any signing that adds to our attacking options. 1.7m for a bit of pace and strength could be useful. It's difficult to read into the goalscoring records of players. When we were good, we made a living out of signing underperforming attacking players and getting a tune out of them.

You know, the myth doesn't really matter. Our owners are wealthy enough that paying double shouldn't really matter. With their level of net worth, whether it's 20m, 40m, or 80m it shouldn't be a hindrance to sending money over. So, I'm fine with the myth being perpetuated, because it really shouldn't stop the hard questions being asked.

I know that I don't and I agree that he's likely been promised more than has been delivered, but neither of those things are really my point. My point is that he shouldn't have believed what he was promised and should have taken the job under the assumption that he would be treated in the same way as every other manager before him. Ie - very little spend with the occasional little blip when the mood strikes (he got his in Cantwell).