Jump to content

BRFCS

BY THE FANS, FOR THE FANS
SINCE 1996
Proudly partnered with TheTerraceStore.com

Venky’s v Indian Government (a) - 13/1/2025 - Re-Arranged Challenge Match


Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, MarkBRFC said:

 

Who is there to sell in Jan to keep us ticking over a little bit more?

Travis and/or Tronstedt are but neither would bring big money.
Maybe Pears if a PL club need a British player to fill their quota and don’t read this forum 🤣

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, RevidgeBlue said:

What a surprise. Another transfer window will go by the wayside.

As mentioned by other posters Waggott needs specifically challenging on his previous assertion that there is "no impediment" to the owners funding the Club as normal.

To boil it down to it's simplest terms, this can't be correct as if it were, why would the owners be bothering to go to Court at all ?

The accounts also state in black and white that liquidity has only been maintained to date thanks to cost cutting and player sales which again contradicts his previous proclamations on the subject.

Don't suppose anyone will actually be able to extract a confession out of him that the owners don't want to fund the Club whilst they have to furnish personal guarantees but we should certainly  try our utmost and it should be satisfying seeing him squirm in the meantime.

Didn’t costs rise for the accounting period?

I agree with what you are saying but Rovers always seem unable to actually reduce costs (on paper) when it is bloody obvious that they reuse teabags and use both sides of bog roll..

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, wilsdenrover said:

Venkys London Limited have the club making a profit before tax of £1.8 million for their most recent  financial period. 

True but if you remove the player trading it's a £20 million loss turnover to costs

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What else can we sell for 20 million... 😕

These accounts highlight the absolute short sighted stupidity of Waggot and his Venky overlords.

Squeezing the fanbase to reach an arbitrary figure which is barely a drop in the ocean in terms of losses, when getting more through the door and the increased feelgood factor, visibility for sponsorship and hospitality as well as match day sales and merchandise, as well as goodwill would surely far outweigh that and might be a much more financially prudent decision over space of 12-18 months than constantly giving your shrinking customer base a shakedown. Then again he's not a businessman, he's an ex dodgy agent turned League 2 community outreach man, who's won the lottery here. 

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Bronzed A Donis said:

What else can we sell for 20 million... 😕

These accounts highlight the absolute short sighted stupidity of Waggot and his Venky overlords.

Squeezing the fanbase to reach an arbitrary figure which is barely a drop in the ocean in terms of losses, when getting more through the door and the increased feelgood factor, visibility for sponsorship and hospitality as well as match day sales and merchandise, as well as goodwill would surely far outweigh that and might be a much more financially prudent decision over space of 12-18 months than constantly giving your shrinking customer base a shakedown. Then again he's not a businessman, he's an ex dodgy agent turned League 2 community outreach man, who's won the lottery here. 

But you're thinking about this from the perspective of someone who isn't completely fucking brain dead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, islander200 said:

Because the reading owner was missing wage payments etc and bills weren't being paid.

I agree the situation is a disgrace but the football authorities ain't going to get involved until such a time we cant pay wages or we ain't able to pay our bills

 

Matter of time then?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Bronzed A Donis said:

What else can we sell for 20 million... 😕

These accounts highlight the absolute short sighted stupidity of Waggot and his Venky overlords.

Squeezing the fanbase to reach an arbitrary figure which is barely a drop in the ocean in terms of losses, when getting more through the door and the increased feelgood factor, visibility for sponsorship and hospitality as well as match day sales and merchandise, as well as goodwill would surely far outweigh that and might be a much more financially prudent decision over space of 12-18 months than constantly giving your shrinking customer base a shakedown. Then again he's not a businessman, he's an ex dodgy agent turned League 2 community outreach man, who's won the lottery here. 

Bang on the money !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Herbie6590 changed the title to Venky’s v Indian Government (a) - 13/1/2025 - Re-Arranged Challenge Match
  • Herbie6590 unpinned this topic

I think it's been made clear from the financial statement that this court case is not a priority for the club given the amount of funds generated from player sales.

They aren't interested in squad building just paying the bills and using frees/loans to keep us going, the 'Brentford model' or 'project' was clearly a load of bollocks. Otherwise they would be getting the owners to chuck us £20m as well as spending the sale money on players.

It's probably enough to keep us going for another 12-18 months so fully expect the court case to be kicked along until at least Jan 2026. At that point hands will be forced as there is nobody in this squad worth more than £1-2m.

If they were disappointed with season ticket sales this summer just wait till the next one, loyalty only goes so far Waggot. He will probably be retired by then hence why he doesn't give two shits.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hard to believe this was only 6 months ago, the board of directors clearly decided the investment is £0 and it wasn't worth having Gregg around anymore.

Speaking to BBC Radio LancashireBroughton revealed his recommendation for how the club utilise the funds over the course of the next 12 months:

“Transfer business over the last 12 months will bring income streams into the club. We had two or three players going out of the club on fees last summer, and since then we’ve had Adam Wharton leave in the club’s record sale and the David Raya deal will land next summer as well.”

“The board of directors have got to decide how they are going to invest that money and at what level they can do that.

“My recommendation to the board is that we look at investment in four areas – firstly transfer fees, secondly the wage bill, thirdly reinvestment into our academy and infrastructure and finally not to blow it all in one go, have some in case we need to go back again in January and next summer.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They don't want to hear that though to them every penny coming in goes to the bills and Waggot and the other guy get brownie points from the owners for asking for less.

Only re-investment comes when the owners sign off the same annual budget and there is a bit of headroom within that budget for a few spare quid.

Never do funds come in strictly to buy players and drive the team/club forwards and never has for a long time by the looks of it. As mentioned above any semblance of any model other than survival would see a few extra quid put in whilst we have income to cover bills and are good with FFP.

That would allow direct player investment with a top 6 aim but it's never happening. It shows what complete clowns run the show when they are disappointed a 30 quid discount doesn't increase sales by thousands. Despite nearly getting relegated, selling every good player and being in the midst of ownership court proceedings dragging the whole club through more uncertainty.

The penny never drops does it down there.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/11/2024 at 10:25, tomphil said:

Its been robust enough to withstand the last near decade and a half on nonsense and nothingness and still have a hardcore of 12k, which would be more if the idiot in charge had gone down a competitive pricing strategy years ago that is more in keeping with the area economics.

You know people are commending us from time to time on our away support.  Bolstered no doubt by those who refuse to give their money to the Venkiscum but still want to watch their beloved footy team.  Makes one wonder how our gates might look once they buggar off and are replaced by proper football people, not like that is happening in my lifetime.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, roverblue said:

Hard to believe this was only 6 months ago, the board of directors clearly decided the investment is £0 and it wasn't worth having Gregg around anymore.

Speaking to BBC Radio LancashireBroughton revealed his recommendation for how the club utilise the funds over the course of the next 12 months:

“Transfer business over the last 12 months will bring income streams into the club. We had two or three players going out of the club on fees last summer, and since then we’ve had Adam Wharton leave in the club’s record sale and the David Raya deal will land next summer as well.”

“The board of directors have got to decide how they are going to invest that money and at what level they can do that.

“My recommendation to the board is that we look at investment in four areas – firstly transfer fees, secondly the wage bill, thirdly reinvestment into our academy and infrastructure and finally not to blow it all in one go, have some in case we need to go back again in January and next summer.”

Not hard to see why he didn't last long here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still winging it season by season instead of ever drawing up 3 year plans, investing a bit then sticking to it.

Or maybe they do maybe we are missing that and the only intention is to chuck a bit in, let the team grow for a few years then sell it to pay down borrowings that have been running it ?

Maybe we are missing that bit because the Mowbray era bucked the selling trend for a few years but in theory he did grown a team but he and his mates somehow contrived to let half of it go on free transfers !

Then followed a budget cut !    Coincidence ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.