Tracking our (outbound) loan players 24/25

[KentExile]

If anything can be read into it, Garrett has "liked" Bristol Rovers' Instagram post about their manager being sacked

https://www.instagram.com/p/DDojVvqvb0w/?hl=en

Edited Monday at 14:44 by KentExile

[bluebruce]

17 hours ago, Tom said:

I don’t think Garrett is good enough, Bristol Rovers obviously don’t either, it happens, unless we were taking the piss with all the failed loans we’ve taken from premier league clubs

I may be being unfair but I don’t expect any of those out on loan to make the grade to be honest 

We gave virtually all of those players a fair crack of the whip. Sometimes an unfair crack of the whip (see Tyler Morton). We didn't see them get rave reviews in their first appearances, peter off a little bit in the next couple, then get dropped from the bench entirely and play them in far less games than they'd played the prior season in the Prem. I can't think of one example where that's happened here.

[KentExile]

Batty not involved for Accrington drew 1-1

Batty was mentioned a month ago as having to undergo a late fitness test (a comment from the Accrington manager about him feeling the back of his knee).  However, he has not featured since, and I have not seen any further mention of the extent of his injury

Edmondson (probably) & Mullarkey-Matthews (unlikely as he hasn't featured for Bamber Bridge since August) may be in action against each other tomorrow night

Edited Tuesday at 09:47 by KentExile

[KentExile]

Edmondson started for Macclesfield v Bamber Bridge, who did not name Mullarkey-Matthews in their match day squad

Edmondson was withdrawn with 20 mins to go whilst Macclesfield were 2-0 up, the game finished 2-0 to Macclesfield.

Edited Tuesday at 21:38 by KentExile

[KentExile]

Apparently Vale is doing his "return to training, rehab stuff" at Rovers (presumably we have better facilities & medical staff than Motherwell) and he will be back there "in a few weeks" (as of last week)

https://www.glasgowworld.com/sport/football/motherwell-fc/motherwell-injury-update-summer-signing-blackburn-rovers-loanee-4906667

Edited Thursday at 10:13 by KentExile

[KentExile]

Tonight's games

O'Riordan on the bench for Cambridge - lost 4-0

Vale still injured so not involved for Motherwell - drew 1-1

Edited Friday at 21:43 by KentExile

[KentExile]

In the early kick off, despite the sacking of the Bristol Rovers manager Matt Taylor, Jake Garrett is still not selected in the squad - drew 1-1

 

 

In the 3pm kick offs

 

Starts today for

Markanday won 1-0, Markanday with the assist for the goal

Olson lost 2-1

Edmondson drew 2-2

Eastham drew 1-1

Honor won 2-0

 

On the bench

Gamble lost 4-1

Powell won 2-1 Powell came on for the last 15

Atcheson lost 2-0

 

Not involved in match day squad

Batty lost 2-0

Montgomery lost 2-0

Wood lost 4-0

Mullarkey-Matthews drew 1-1

Michalski & Ramwell lost 2-1

 

Cypriot teams (Saadi) play on Monday

Edited 14 hours ago by KentExile

[KentExile]

Markanday assist/Chesterfield highlights

https://www.skysports.com/watch/video/13278149/chesterfield-1-0-afc-wimbledon-league-two-highlights

[Exiled_Rover]

1 hour ago, KentExile said:

Markanday assist/Chesterfield highlights

https://www.skysports.com/watch/video/13278149/chesterfield-1-0-afc-wimbledon-league-two-highlights

It's disappointing that the least interesting prospect is doing the best on loan.

I was hoping for big jumps by Garrett, Batty, O'Riordan et al. Markanday has already proven he's not good enough for the Championship.

[Penwortham Blue]

12 minutes ago, Exiled_Rover said:

It's disappointing that the least interesting prospect is doing the best on loan.

I was hoping for big jumps by Garrett, Batty, O'Riordan et al. Markanday has already proven he's not good enough for the Championship.

I have to agree that he hasn’t shown anything in a Rovers shirt to suggest he can make it. Having said that, he hasn’t shown anything never really had an extended run and was rated highly at Spurs and is a real fans favourite at Saltergate. I would be happy to see him back and given a chance but given our current league position, it doesn’t look like a recall would work for either Rovers or the player.

[KentExile]

24 minutes ago, Exiled_Rover said:

It's disappointing that the least interesting prospect is doing the best on loan.

I was hoping for big jumps by Garrett, Batty, O'Riordan et al. Markanday has already proven he's not good enough for the Championship.

Batty was having a good spell, been injured for the past month, and Accrington's form has dropped off a cliff since he has been missing.  1 win in the 7 he has missed

https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/jake-batty/leistungsdatendetails/spieler/866669/wettbewerb/GB4/saison/2024

 

Garrett and O'Riordan, I agree, have had a wasted 6 months

Edited 11 hours ago by KentExile

[bluebruce]

5 hours ago, Penwortham Blue said:

I have to agree that he hasn’t shown anything in a Rovers shirt to suggest he can make it. Having said that, he hasn’t shown anything never really had an extended run and was rated highly at Spurs and is a real fans favourite at Saltergate. I would be happy to see him back and given a chance but given our current league position, it doesn’t look like a recall would work for either Rovers or the player.

I think a recall and a loan to League One should work for Rovers and the player, assuming there's interest.

[roversfan99]

I dont think it matters to us in terms of his Rovers future where he spends the second half of the season as his contract I think is up in the summer and he should be let go. If a League 1 club will pay us a small fee or more of his wages to take him then yes, but otherwise, its all about what Markanday needs as he looks to a future post Rovers.

[chaddyrovers]

Need to find new loan homes for Garrett and O'Riordan in January 

[KentExile]

4 hours ago, roversfan99 said:

I dont think it matters to us in terms of his Rovers future where he spends the second half of the season as his contract I think is up in the summer and he should be let go. If a League 1 club will pay us a small fee or more of his wages to take him then yes, but otherwise, its all about what Markanday needs as he looks to a future post Rovers.

He has a year option which will be triggered regardless, as even if Rovers do not plan on keeping him, they will be able to get a fee (with add ons & a sell on which will be the main concern)

Edited 1 hour ago by KentExile