Jump to content

BRFCS

BY THE FANS, FOR THE FANS
SINCE 1996
Proudly partnered with TheTerraceStore.com

v Coventry City (h) - 21/01/25, k/o 19:45


Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Tom said:

That’s frustrating, we’ve dominated but trail, really poor from JRC for the goal, the balls there to be won but he’s backed away from it.

Looking to the bench it will be difficult to do too much but the feather in our cap may be the manager in the other dugout is hardly a master tactician 

As I've said previously - Eustace is the reason we are where we are. Most managers in this division are shit (including the waster in the opposition dugout tonight). 

Give him Coventry's squad and he's challenging for automatics. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Backroom
Just now, Neal said:

Really gutted for the boys there. Played well, miles better side. We need to go for it early in the 2nd half. 

I’m with you here, not going to slate them for a half we’ve been far the better team, there will be chances in this for us. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Forever Blue said:

He went walkabouts and flapped at the ball. Dreadful keeping. Pears would have been hammered for that

He'd just punched the ball out under pressure, then rightly kept an eye on it until it was clearly heading to the back stick, he hardly 'went walkabouts'. The header was point blank, flapping at the ball and hoping for the best is about all you can do. I'd argue he could have taken a slight step back to give himself more time to react, but that's a hindsight thing and if the lad had really bullet headered it that could have been worse than closing the space. He didn't save it, so ultimately he takes some blame, but it was hardly 'a shocking error'.

  • Like 5
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, davulsukur said:

Don't think Toth was to blame, JRC let him down by not challenging well for the ball.

That aside, I think we've been alright tbf. 

Best 45 from Gueye by some distance.

Give over.

You're expecting your CM to win a header against a 6'3" CF at the back post?

It's not happening - and again is why it's BAFFLING  we don't whip the ball into the box for our 6'5" CF at every opportunity. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, bluebruce said:

He'd just punched the ball out under pressure, then rightly kept an eye on it until it was clearly heading to the back stick, he hardly 'went walkabouts'. The header was point blank, flapping at the ball and hoping for the best is about all you can do. I'd argue he could have taken a slight step back to give himself more time to react, but that's a hindsight thing and if the lad had really bullet headered it that could have been worse than closing the space. He didn't save it, so ultimately he takes some blame, but it was hardly 'a shocking error'.

It was also a terrible punch. Two errors from the keeper there in quick succession.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Backroom
Just now, Exiled_Rover said:

Give over.

You're expecting your CM to win a header against a 6'3" CF at the back post?

It's not happening - and again is why it's BAFFLING  we don't whip the ball into the box for our 6'5" CF at every opportunity. 

He may not win it but he has to challenge rather than backing away 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, BigBar said:

I'd struggle to praise any of them, JRC, Cantwell, Buckley and Hedges? They have done the combined total of fcuk all. Nothing.

They've been ok - Hedges the worst of that bunch by a mile, obviously.

A few mistimed passes by JRC and Cantwell refusing to take the game by the scruff of the neck, but by and large we've been on top. There's just no quality going into the box. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Forever Blue said:

Exactly. Made it easy for the striker to nod it in. If he stayed on his line it was an easy save. All the players looked at him cos they knew he’d fucked up. 

Yep -if he makes the decision to come for it, he has to get to it. If he stays on his line it's an easy save.

If Pears had have done that all hell  would have broken loose. Because it's Pears' replacement it's JRC's fault.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That was disgusting by JRC, and wtf was Toth doing.

At the other end Hedges slow to react to a rebound. Just a toe poke and it’s 1-0.

We’ve nothing upfront or in midfield. Coventry have been worse and to be winning is a gift.

Venkys, thanks for reinvesting some of that money you shameless sacks of shit.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, onlyonejackwalker said:

A tad unlucky here. We've looked good and created some opportunities. Some good performances so far. 

The only chance of real substance was the Gueye header, and that was a good save. The Gueye shot and the Batth header are half chances at best that, on an other day, maybe go in. 

Too many times we've got into good positions and either refused to cross it or chosen the wrong option. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stoke 2.0

Long balls, Long Throws and Corners... Big Frank Lampard. 

Coventry ShirtPull FC getting exactly what they want here...Their #29 has literally got away with 4 shirt pulls that half. Unreal shit ref, without any real disaster decisions.

Not sure what subs I'd make, as I literally don't trust any of the 9 subs to make a positive difference. Maybe the CM can show some urgency and we go forwards more often??

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, cesus said:

Watching Coventry wiping the ball in off corners and putting our defence under serious pressure further reminds me just how awful our set pieces have been for years.

 

Yeah, their tactic of just dropping the ball into the 6 yard box with someone illegally blocking the GK is a nightmare to deal with. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.