Then make him a junior scout, not the Director of Football. It's a pretty well-paid gig, we shouldn't be putting anyone there unless we're confident they're up to it. Not just 'oh they used to play football'. Again we could any ex-footballer in the role by that logic, and 99% of them would be dogshit at it.

No, not except here. Here is precisely where I was talking about. Didn't say we can never improve, just there's no such thing as 'can't be worse'. Which is very different to asking who we can replace them with. Also I was very much one of the ones who had wanted Mowbray gone for a long time.

Well, it was written by someone called Nick Mashiter. Sounds like someone who steals toilets.

Must be the thousandth time I've seen someone here say 'couldn't be any worse than X'. Most of the time, they do turn out to be worse.

No, not really. Plenty of footballers are as thick as mince. Quite a few who don't demonstrate much understanding of the game even. Even if they understand the game, that's entirely different to understanding the backroom side of the game, negotiating deals, contracts, highlighting targets and getting your point across etc. Broughton had at least worked in the backroom part of the game and had some dealings with recruitment and development of players. Hell let's just put Scott Wharton in the role eh? Footballer, loves the club...that's all some people are interested in when it comes to high level appointments.

Don't be so sure. Some of the shit that vast swathes of the fanbase have been willing to swallow has been truly astounding. We already have a seasoned supporter saying he'd be 'more than happy' with it for some baffling reason.

Why in the ungodly fuck would you be 'more than happy' with us appointing a DoF who not only doesn't have experience in that role, but as far as I can see doesn't have any experience in any role beyond 'footballer'? Just because he used to be a good player for us? Come on! That's just a ridiculous position to have. I'm almost as qualified as he is!

It's not really a trick. It's absolutely fair enough, because regardless of their abilities, both of them were undermined at every turn.

He's certainly very clever when it comes to self preservation. It's a shame that precisely none of his intelligence is geared towards the competent operation of a football club. In fact it just might all be in the self preservation arena. Makes me think of a roleplaying video game, where someone might put all their points into one attribute. His overloaded attribute being: snakelike self-preservation chicanery.

The notion that we've undergone all this change and come close to the playoffs after we finally got shut of Mowbray, just to end up with another Mowbray-like manager, kills my soul. And tbh, currently I don't even think he'll be as good as Mowbray was.

Aye I figured that's what's meant when I read Tyrone''s post about it and realised I've heard it before. Think I was thrown by the context, especially mentioning opposition defenders doing them.

He's the one that chose to keep him on for the second half when he had been abysmal though, with predictable results.

What are pull-backs? Apart from another addition to the ever-expanding football lexicon.

I've never heard of a cap clause specifying it had to be in a 'competitive' game.

We lost 40k on that deal according to who? We sold him for a few hundred k after 6 months, so without knowing his wage, agent fee, signing on fee, surely it's not possible to know whether we made a small profit or a small loss? Assuming you meant Ennis with that part.