I think the main point being working for this club it must be in the back of their minds constantly anyway and this industry in general is hardly secure. At the end of the day the football club is an local institution that belongs to the town and it's purpose first and foremost is to provide entertainment and a bit of pride. If it takes a big step back and downscale but in doing so gets rid of the loons and parasites whilst falling into the hands of real custodians, vast wealth or not, then i'm all in. I'd much prefer things to be corrected the way the should be right now but that is never going to happen is it, it hasn't happened in a decade barring the odd brief pretence. Nobody on the Ewood payroll is crying about my or your jobs yet fans are expected to just rock up paying £25/35 per game or £4/500 per ST and continue to be treated like idiots. Whilst the rich sat in the void get richer and the owners make cock up after cock up but it's ok because they can afford it ? In the bin with that, enough is enough.

The blame lies entirely in India i'm sure they'd be aware of that.

Yet another mutual agreement then, very common here over the years 😑

Correct. A big part of Sammies success is his workrate and attitude, that isn't coming from Siggy he's a luxury player who will struggle under Eustace.

That account is the damage limitation account on behalf of the club whoever it is. Always toes the party line and never tells anything Nixon hasn't said first.

Like i said it's hard to take in when hes worked it fine for 97% of transfers usually not involving big money.

It's a fair point to make and it would be of no surprise if the system was at fault or not fit for purpose or lack of basic training but it did seem to work for the majority of transfers. Somehow no one could work it properly for mid season big money buys though so it seems rather selective.

Only in Rovers world could some think for one min a reasonably popular player, who was only here 5 mins, has zero experience of anything related to being a DoF is a better bet than the one leaving. Come on guys this is classic Venky/Waggot window dressing on the cheaper.

The fat man is just looking to stuff his pockets with as much bonus and % as he can as his retirement moves closer.

Waggot simply has to go no ifs or buts it's as plain as the nose on your face this guy is bad news. Whatever we think of the egg and my views are mixed he is another who has been sold a dud and undermined at every turn because the crooks in office at the club didn't want this model. Shaking them out their comfort zone and bypassing their little cartel. Said it ages ago Waggot and the shadow MD are Shagnew and GB is Shebby, we have revisited that era yet again. Also always said Waggot has his eye on us being the small time zero funded Barnsley model to carry on their cushy no fuss little number. In trying for this hes actually creating the new Charlton here and will leave us in the same position as them if he stays another 2 seasons. The man MUST go, end of.

Much more qualified ? You are aware of Silvester's background, experience and the sheer amount of transfers in and out hes overseen right ?

Glen M and his meeting with Waggot.

We'd sell as many as Preston at their prices iv'e no doubts.

But they portray ambition, ask Broughton ask JDT ask numerous players, all been sold a pup. If this fella is what it says on the tin he won't be here long. Training raw cheap options like Rudy and bringing in already on the parent firm Indian cricket fans is how the Venky model really works.

It was a useless pointless signing of a player that in no way fit the then head coaches style and had a fitness record you'd expect of a 40 yr old. It was well documented at the Plymouth end when they wanted to keep him Rovers had offered 3 times as much. I wait with baited breath the gems Broughton is going to foist on us this summer using his extensive knowledge of getting young players to polish. Judging by the efforts so far industrial strength stuff won't polish that lot.