didnt use 3 at the back at WBA or Celtic but a 4-2-3-1 formation(mostly) like I said. But you clearly you know best

Ive only posted what I was told.. Dont know why we keep mention Hanley, Duffy and Marshall. They left and now we move on and build a new squad to achieve promotion this season

Marshall and Duffy were offered 25% increase in their wages when offered new contracts last summer so I was told by Alan Nixon. Maybe Mulgrew will go but it needs a offer from a club yet. Rumours are Boro and Hull want him.

We are linked to sign Oztumer, Dack, Bostock, Gladwin who can play the 10 role. Why are we being linked with these players if we are going to play a number 10 player. Plus we got Bennett, Conway,.Feeney and Rankin Costello to wide roles

Is 4-4-1-1 the same formation tbh? So you would like me to be wrong?

Did last season. Make us more solid at the back This summer he talk about playing attacking passing style. So I expect him to revert back to his WBA formation of 4-2-3-1 now.

Players are being signed for the formation we will be using this season whilst as last summer recruitment seem to be all over the place and players not signed for the formation we were playing. Under Coyle first few games we played 3 different formation in 6 games which is crazy. Under Mowbray he appears to be know what his 1st choice formation will be which I think will be 4-2-3-1 formation. You see us signed Smallwood and Whittingham to play the 2 centre midfield roles. Plus the links with Bostock, Oztumer and Dack who can play the 10 role in that formation

Being saying this from when he was going to sign here, signed here for a specific role within the team and style

Amazing cos if you look at Boro local reporter comments and Andy Bayes comments both saying good signing by all accounts. You just been over negative recently and very much anti Mowbray. Mowbray knows the player and the job he can do at this level. Look at Scunthorpe when he was there and after. Have you seen him Jim? Ever going to response to my question in the Cricket or just ignore it as per usual.

Rovers are delighted to announce the signing of midfielder Richie Smallwood. #WelcomeRichie ?⚪️ Read more ➡️ https://t.co/ic8XZMgIom https://t.co/kObZdHPHDj

Any responses to these questions since you insulted me and my family? An apologise would be nice from you!!!

Mowbray on Whittingham http://www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk/sport/football/rovers/news/15351271._Hopefully_he_will_help_us_play_as_we_want_to____Tony_Mowbray_sees_Peter_Whittingham_as_a_key_cog_in_the_Rovers_engine_room_next_season/?ref=mac

Are these 2 accounting firms still there?

Whittingham comments https://www.rovers.co.uk/news/2017/june/im-excited-to-be-here---whittingham/ Rovers going to play passing football and try to win the league

Very good signing at this level. Bring experience, good at set pieces and passing.. Keep them coming Mowbray

I accept that.

People will watch England games. India and Pakistan games will be popular. But some games wont attracted people to watch. But these games are being played when Children are still at Schools. not ideal for high turnout my step son isn't interested in sport full stop, he more interested in drama, computer games, tv series, Comics and Photography. My step daughter will watch Rovers game with me, but isn't interested in sport. She prefer Dancing, art and Tv shows still no response? WHY NOT? I'm really interested in knowing how you can judge me and my family when you don't have a clue about a life or what we do apart from what I mention on here. so what gets you the right to tell me what to do with my money that I work hard for?

If want to watch cricket they will find a way. Cricket is a day sport when most ppl are working when Rugby is played on weekend. 6 nations was good this year granted but I missed of it by being at Rovers games. This winter Ashes series will be on bt sport and I dont have BT sport so I have decision to make. But with working nights I wouldnt be able to watch alot of it. I dont know who has the highlights package either..

People can easily watch Cricket on tv if they want. All my family have Sky or Virgin and most of my friends do aswell. Like I said yesterday, Sky is a must in our. I will be watching the cricket today. Channel 4 coverage were getting worse slowly with them keep wanting play to start at 10.30 so that They come show Hollyoaks at 6.30.

Still no response Jim? I wonder why?

Why? Cos I think you are damn right cheeky and bang out of order Jim. You have no idea of our life or the things my kids and me and the missus are into apart from what ive mention I dont see what right you got telling anybody what to do in their life.

Agreed Thats your life not mine. My kids enjoying doing what they. We have day outs aswell just for record I enjoying watching sport on tv like football, cricket, rugby, F1. etc. We have a holiday every year thanks Jim.

Waste? Shut up Jim. You are talking out of backside. In our house having Sky is a must. Sport, Tv shows, movies and kids shows. Why? Should my money go to the government instead? Nope. I earn it, my right to spend it.

No it wasnt.. Watched every ball of the Ashes 2005 actually..plus attending 3 full days Cricket. You cant take those memories away. Great days with friends and families

But think about how much coverage of cricket Sky has and the quality. A lot of people have Sky or BT or Virgin these days. But kids these days are more interested in playing computers or on phones than playing sports. a lot of kids aren't interested in Sport. I'm paying nearly 1800 pounds per year to sky and I don't regret a penny of it due to excellent sport coverage whichever you like, loads of movies whether its kids or action or Comedy you like and some great TV shows. all of the family watch it so we have plenty of choice.