Yes. But if it was possible to have both then that would be even better

Never at any time have I stated it should be either/or. I totally agree that we should do our upmost to keep both. What I said is that I personally would be more disappointed for the team, if we where not to sign Reed, than if we where to sell Dack.

I am not comparing their football abilities, but their possible effects on the team.

Whereas Reed just seems to make the whole team tick. Yesterday he was everywhere making things happen, stopping their attacks, and the goal wasn't bad!

with the added time it was more like 20 mins. One of our best points ever

Why?

Yes

No, why should I, have you read the context of this thread.

He might not have a handkerchief.

first 70 minutes we could have won it , the last 20 minutes we showed some bollocks.

come on Eileen

I thought in our last four games if we had got 4 point with 4 draws I would be happy. We have got 5 points onwards and upwards

If we where to lose Dack but sign Reed I would not be devastated. If we could have both I would be extatic.

I just enjoyed today, it's what is being a Rovers fan is all about.

what pubs to go in before the game near the railway station?

Which begs the question, is this the WBA thread

I am on the 09:17 train from Preston.

Because I work for the company who they usually hire the aircraft from, and I might have got a free trip.

West Brom may do that

I would have thought that route will take well over 4 hours.

It seemed that TM brought him over to the left wing later on so that he could tell him what to do, as he looked a bit lost.

Nobody near me in the Blackburn end seemed particularly impressed with him yesterday, I certainly wasn't.

For me there would be no choice never mind a tough one. COYB

I would believe a comment from someone at the game over TV on a non league fixture.

More like Sue-Helen